Tuesday, February 17, 2009

THE TYRANNY OF POSITIVE THINKING

I have been thinking about this issue for a long time, and certainly more so since being diagnosed with cancer. I reflect often on how many people, friends, colleagues, and acquaintances, have told me to be "positive." "You know" they say, "attitude is the most important thing with cancer!" It is funny how these kinds of comments are made with the utmost sincerity and assuredness. I think those who have told me this actually do believe that this is true. I don't. Here is why.



There is considerable research that optimistic people do better with cancer and other illnesses as well, so it would seem that there should be a correlation between positive thinking and better outcomes, and in fact there is. The problem is that this conventional wisdom, that thinking positively will result in a better outcome is based on observing a correlation, not a cause. That is to say, folks who naturally are able to be optimistic about their cancer seem to do better than people who don't. But, I contend, people who are not naturally optimistic, and try to be, or to fake it in order to have those around them not worry about their supposedly dangerous negativity, actually do worse than if they dealt with their fears and worries in a different way.



One of the most helpful books that I have read about this is called: The Positive Power of Negative Thinking by Julie K. Norem.


In this book, Dr. Norem presents her considerable experimental evidence that there are a number of effective anxiety coping styles, and that different people respond differently to them. There are the "strategic optimists" who do best by denying that there is a problem and just going forward in a positive manner. This is the style that those folks who are trying to be helpful by telling us cancer patients to be optimistic seem to be promoting. The other effective style she calls "defensive pessimists." These folks (I think I lean toward this style) do better when they spend their energy thinking through every possible problem that could arise in the situation they are worried about, and make plans ahead of time about how they are going to handle those problems should they arise. The really interesting finding in her research is that for people at the extreme of each of these styles, having them do activities that would help people with the other style, actually makes them worse, and more anxious, not less. So, strategic optimists who are given a relaxation tape before a stressful event, do better than without it. But "defensive pessimists" do best if they are given a tape that guides them through a process of listing all the possible negative issues that might arise and gives them time to plan ahead what they might do in those circumstances. When the strategic optimists were given this tape, they became more anxious and eventually performed more poorly in the task. When the defensive pessimists were given the relaxation tape, they also were more anxious, and performed more poorly; presumably they felt stressed having to relax rather than prepare!



A recent study demonstrated the long known correlation between stress, fear, and cancer growth. Melanoma cells that were exposed to adrenaline, one of our main stress hormones, grew much faster than those not exposed. The effect was so marked that the researchers suggested using drugs called Beta-blockers to stop this reaction when telling a patient of their diagnosis. Many other studies have confirmed similar findings. So, it is clear that helping cancer patients feel less stressed will result in better outcomes. But the rub is in how to do this. And the idea, that one style fits all, and that that is to "be positive" seems to me to be a big mistake. Strategic optimists probably would do better with this kind of encouragement, but the defensive pessimists would probably do worse.





Another wrinkle in this issue comes from the work of Dr. James Pennebaker from Texas. His seminal book is entitled "Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions" . It is out of print but you can still get used copies. It is well worth it. In addition, many of his studies are available for free on his web site: http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Faculty/Pennebaker/Home2000/JWPhome.htm

In his many studies he found increased immune function in people who were able to express their deeper thoughts and feelings about a trauma, to another person, or even a journal, compared to those who didn't, and just kept those feelings inside. I think that this is at least one of the reasons why the studies that showed that cancer support groups increased life span of cancer patients actually worked.



I know that I always feel less anxious and worried after I am able to talk about those feelings, either with a therapist, a friend, my wife, or even to other patients in the chemo room. For me, being told to be positive makes me feel like I am all alone with these emotions that seem to be unacceptable to that other person. I feel shut down, as if, I have to just carry the thoughts and feelings around all on my own. Of course, no one wants to bring others down, so I try to choose carefully who I can unburden myself with. On the other hand not feeling alone with my negative feelings, and knowing that these feelings and thoughts are accepted, has always helped me to feel better. I believe strongly, that for me, having to pretend all the time to feel positive, when I actually felt bad, would probably be worse for my health, and probably creates the local conditions around the cancer that would encourage its growth. I often talk to my wife Janet, but sometimes I worry that hearing my worries too frequently could be too much for her. Fortunately, I have found friends that I feel comfortable talking to and sharing my feelings with. When friends are not available for that, I turn to my journal, and perhaps in the future, this blog, and unburden myself there.



So, here is my advice for those of you who are thinking of what to say to your friend or relative who is dealing with cancer. Maybe you could ask them how they would like to be talked with. "Would you prefer to talk about your cancer and your feelings, or would it be better to act like you don't even have it and just act like everything is normal?" You might be surprised by what they say. They might even have different answers on different days. Relating to them how they feel best at that time might be the best present you could give them.

3 comments:

  1. Thank you, Dr. M, for this thoughtful opportunity. I appreciate the resources you shared & actually had a new patient today that will likely benefit from this perspective. I think I signed up to follow the blog...but don't know for sure if it worked! But it is my intention and I consider it an honor to be part of holding this space for you, while broadening and clarifying my own understandings. Many blessings your way! Kim Palka

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Kim, It is great to hear from you. I am so glad that what I wrote may help your patient.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, thanks Dr Messer for sharing that. I've never thought about positive thinking that way... but it really makes sense. Also, thanks for sharing the last part about asking a loved one (or even patient I'm sure) how they'd like to approach the subject of their cancer. Your thoughts are really helpful. I hope you are well. Thanks for sharing this. Cara :)

    ReplyDelete